MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123058679 · doi:10.7202/1007482ar

Les spiritualités féministes

2010· article· fr· W2123058679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En ce début du xxie siècle, une ère du sacré est en train de s’instaurer et la recherche grandissante de spiritualité en dehors des cadres institutionnels est remarquable. Dans cette émergence, on note l’importance des théologies de la libération et des théologies féministes qui ont coloré la transformation de la vision du spirituel et donné naissance à des formes inédites, dont les spiritualités féministes.Cet article présente, dans un premier temps, le désir des femmes d’en apprendre davantage à propos des images féminines du divin et de développer leur manière spécifique de nommer Dieu/e. Il propose ensuite diverses expressions ou rituels de ces spiritualités pour en dégager finalement quelques pistes positives de renouveau spirituel lors de rassemblements communautaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it