Cartografía de un proyecto de comercio justo en el sur: la central Interregional de artesanos de Perú
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distance or contradictions between fair trade discourses and practices seem to be a daily preoccupation for the activists in the north and south.This problem reflects in fact a limited knowledge of the partners in the south even if the fair trade discourses are oriented towards the partnership and egalitarian relations.Instead of producing an impact study or an analysis of the contradictions between discourses and practices, we propose to dive in the distance between them as the locus of politics.This will allow us to understand better the elaboration of a collective project always contested by the participants.We will follow a Peruvian organization named CIAP ( Central Interregional de los artesanos del Perú) in the places where its project is negotiated, both inside the organization and with its networks-.The goal is to understand its project with an approach based on the study of its construction that is characterized by representational dynamics, that can be understood through the concepts of translation and negotiation of meaning.Globally, we propose a cartography of the places where the project is being negotiated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".