MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123091708 · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2005.04.010

Frequency of isolation of pathogens from nosocomial bloodstream infection in a tertiary referral hospital in the United Arab Emirates

2006· letter· en· W2123091708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Jumaa, Rune Neringer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBacteremiaReferralBlood cultureClinical microbiologyIsolation (microbiology)Infection controlAntimicrobialInternal medicineScopusBloodstream infectionEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineMEDLINEMicrobiologyFamily medicineAntibioticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data on antimicrobial resistance and patterns of nosocomial infection are lacking for the United Arab Emirates (UAE).1 From February 2001 to May 2002, we performed a surveillance study on nosocomial bloodstream infection in a tertiary referral hospital in the UAE. The laboratory and clinical data on all positive blood cultures were reviewed prospectively. Parameters used to define strains as clinically significant and representing true infection rather than contamination, included the identity of the microorganism, the presence of more than one blood culture with the same microorganism and the presence of the same microorganism as that found in the blood in another site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207