Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to realize a pure self (moi pure), the poet Paul Valry (1871-1945) dedicates to the intellect Idol (Idole de l'intellect) cult, a self-consciousness skeptic method, expressed in an extremely fragmented writing about the mental processes and the artistic making (in his public work and, mainly, in his Cahiers). One of the main consequences of this method is a digressive and ambiguous critic of philosophy, which the present Thesis postulates and develops through the following studies: about the elaboration of a relatively autonomous life style, at the same time practical and contemplative (mainly in his Lonard de Vinci and Edmond Teste essays); about the difference between philosophy and science, understanding that all knowledge is power; about the comprehension of metaphysical problems as nonsense, as result of the verbal automatism (automatisme verbal), the lack of the language operation consciousness; about the pure poetry poetic as the rcit abolition and conciliation between poetry and abstract thought; about the Platonism inversion, in hybrids works of fiction (mainly in his socratic dialogues, as L'me et la danse and Eupalinos -Ou l'architecte). In all these studies, philosophy is understood not as a science, but, such as poetry, as an artistic gender, a personal form of organizing aesthetically the world chaos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".