High‐resolution mass spectrometric mapping of reovirus digestion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reovirus is an enteric virus built from eight structural proteins that form a double-layered capsid. During virus entry into cells the reovirus outermost capsid layer (composed of proteins sigma3 and mu1C) is proteolytically processed to generate first an infectious subviral particle (ISVP), then the transcriptionally active core particle. Previous studies have demonstrated that protein sigma3, the outermost protein in the viral capsid, is removed from virus particles extremely rapidly. Other studies, using the detergent tetradecyl sulfate (14SO4) in combination with the protease chymotrypsin, have shown that mu1C cleavage is not necessary for infectious viral processing. We have recently used mass spectrometry to characterize the cascade of sigma3 proteolysis in intact reovirus serotype 1 Lang (T1L) virions (Mendez et al., Virology 2003; 311: 289-304). In the present study, we use high-resolution mass spectrometry to characterize the cascade of outer capsid digestion of both T1L and the other commonly used reovirus strain (serotype 3 Dearing [T3D]), with the protease trypsin, both in the presence and absence of 14SO4. These studies indicate that digestion kinetics and specificities are determined both by virus type and by presence or absence of detergent. Presence of detergent accelerated digestion of both outer capsid proteins. In contrast to chymotrypsin digestion, which segregated sigma3 digestion from mu1 digestion, both proteins were rapidly digested by trypsin in the presence of detergent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".