MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123157707 · doi:10.2514/6.2004-1827

Active Control of Inflatable Structure Membrane Wrinkles Using Genetic Algorithm and Neural Network

2004· article· en· W2123157707 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflatableArtificial neural networkComputer scienceGenetic algorithmControl (management)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmMachine learningEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the application of genetic algorithm and neural network in active control of inflatable structure membrane wrinkles. The membrane to be controlled is a 500mm × 500mm Kapton membrane, pulled by two pairs of forces applied at the four corners along the diagonals. Different combinations of the tensions produce various wrinkles within the membrane. The genetic algorithm is introduced briefly and then used in searching for the optimal force that minimizes the amplitude of the membrane. To predict the membrane flatness in space where direct measurement of membrane flatness is difficult, a neural network model is proposed to map boundary stretching tensions and space environment to membrane flatness. Numerical simulation shows that genetic algorithm works very well in optimizing the tensions and neural network is effective to estimate the flatness of the membrane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207