MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123181968 · doi:10.1109/tasc.2007.906001

Physical Modeling of Hot-Electron Superconducting Single-Photon Detectors

2007· article· en· W2123181968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinetic inductancePhysicsPhotonSuperconductivityDetectorAmplitudeElectromagnetic radiationInductanceWavelengthElectronCoupling (piping)OptoelectronicsOpticsCondensed matter physicsVoltageMaterials scienceNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we treat the incident photons as an electromagnetic plane wave and simulate the wave power coupling to the the hot-electron superconducting single-photon detector to investigate its connection with the experimental system quantum efficiency over different wavelengths. Then we propose a lumped equivalent circuit model based on the kinetic inductance variation induced by the incident photon stream when the serpentine superconducting thin-film nano-wire is dc-biased close to its critical current. The computed output voltage matches experimental results for both amplitude and frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it