MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123202786 · doi:10.3152/147154302781780868

Book reviews

2002· article· en· W2123202786 on OpenAlexaffabout
Morley Lipsett

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Public Policy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingLibrary sciencePolitical scienceScientific publishingCapital (architecture)Economic historyMedia studiesHistorySociologyLawArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Ships, chips and whatever is next Get access Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: the Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages by Perez Carlota Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2002, US$65, 1-84064-922-4 Morley Lipsett Morley Lipsett Centre for Policy Research on Science and Technology, Simon Fraser University, 515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3, Canada; E-mail: lipsett@sfu.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Science and Public Policy, Volume 29, Issue 5, October 2002, Pages 397–398, https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781780868 Published: 01 October 2002

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5290.498

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience and Public PolicySame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207