MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123202786 · doi:10.3152/147154302781780868

Book reviews

2002· article· en· W2123202786 on OpenAlex
Morley Lipsett

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Public Policy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingLibrary sciencePolitical scienceScientific publishingCapital (architecture)Economic historyMedia studiesHistorySociologyLawArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Ships, chips and whatever is next Get access Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: the Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages by Perez Carlota Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2002, US$65, 1-84064-922-4 Morley Lipsett Morley Lipsett Centre for Policy Research on Science and Technology, Simon Fraser University, 515 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3, Canada; E-mail: lipsett@sfu.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Science and Public Policy, Volume 29, Issue 5, October 2002, Pages 397–398, https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781780868 Published: 01 October 2002

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it