MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123211752 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68440-7

Advancement of global health: key messages from the Disease Control Priorities Project

2006· article· en· W2123211752 on OpenAlexaff
Ramanan Laxminarayan, Anne Mills, Joel G. Breman, Anthony R Measham, George A.O. Alleyne, M Claeson, Prabhat Jha, Philip Musgrove, Jeffrey Chow, Sonbol Shahid-Salles, Dean T. Jamison

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalCentre for Global Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisease controlPsychological interventionGlobal healthProduct (mathematics)Control (management)BusinessIntervention (counseling)MedicineQuality (philosophy)DiseaseEnvironmental healthEconomic growthPublic healthNursingEconomicsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0150.021
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0450.040
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations325
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207