Further Observations and Analysis of the Rapidly Pulsating Subdwarf B Star EC 20117−4014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the results of further observations and the subsequent analysis of the rapidly pulsating subdwarf B star EC 20117-4014. Despite our efforts, the only pulsations detected were those already reported by O'Donoghue et al., at 137.3, 142.1, and 157.4 s. We attempted a detailed asteroseismological analysis by thoroughly exploring the four-dimensional parameter space defining our equilibrium stellar structures [ T eff , log g , M * , log q (H)] in search of models that could account precisely for the three observed periodicities. We were able to isolate just two potential families of optimal models, one of which is to be preferred on the basis of the period fit achieved and the surface gravity inferred. To proceed, we used external constraints on the effective temperature from published independent optical spectroscopy. Unfortunately, the contamination of the optical spectrum of EC 20117-4014 made it hard to quantify the uncertainties on the estimated spectroscopic temperature of ~34,800 K, and consequently, we adopted the conservative point of view that the true value would lie somewhere in the rather broad interval 32,800-36,800 K. Despite this limitation, leading to less accurate estimates of structural parameters than has been possible before for isolated pulsating EC 14026 stars, we still find that our asteroseismological exercise has been quite fruitful. Indeed, on the basis of our current models, we find that EC 20117-4014 would have a (logarithmic) surface gravity in the range 5.848-5.864 dex, a total mass in the range 0.50-0.59 M ☉ , and a (logarithmic) fractional mass of its H envelope in the interval from -4.10 to -4.25 dex. From these primary parameters, we obtained useful estimates of secondary quantities such as the radius, the luminosity, the absolute visual magnitude, and the distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".