Development of an HR Practitioner Competency Model and Determining the Important Business Competencies: An Empirical Study in Malaysia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to develop an HR competency model perceived by the HR professionals and to determine their roles as strategic business partner (SBP) in Malaysia. An empirical study was carried out during 2009-2010 among the HR practitioners and consultants. Data were collected by using structured questionnaires and a total of 380 (n) complete questionnaires were used for the statistical analysis. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was carried out to develop the HR practitioner competency model. Findings demonstrated that the ‘generic/ behavioral competency’ category and ‘technical HR competency’ category were significant to the competency model. Though, six business competency factors were found statistically important, but the overall business competency category was not significant. That implies HR professionals highly contribute to the operational activities rather than being strategic business partner (SBP). The findings can be useful in establishing competency frameworks, measuring human capital capabilities, designing training programs, establishing on-boarding programs, developing career and succession plans, and drawing the appropriate reward plans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it