An experimental study of uniaxial fatigue behavior of an epoxy resin by a new noncontact real‐time strain measurement and control system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Uniaxial fatigue behavior of an epoxy resin was investigated with a recently established non‐contact real‐time strain measurement and control system. A relation of strain amplitude vs. fatigue life for fully‐reversed strain‐range‐controlled uniaxial fatigue tests was obtained. Quantitative analyses of evolutions of various mechanical properties (including stress range, elastic modulus, nonlinear stress‐strain relation, dissipated strain energy density, etc.) during entire fatigue life period were carried out based on recorded stress‐strain data. From the evolution of the stress‐strain hysteresis loops, a gradual degradation of modulus and a decrease of nonlinear effect in stress‐strain response were observed. It was also found that these two phenomena were independent of the loading control mode (stress‐control or strain‐range‐control) and the mean stress/strain values in the cyclic loading. Fractographic analysis was also performed and the mechanism of crack initiation and propagation of the epoxy material under cyclic loading was investigated. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:780–788, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".