Growth of CuInSe<sub>2</sub> thin films by a single-step electrodeposition technique using acetonitrile as complexing agent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thin films of CuInSe 2 were grown on SnO 2 coated glass microslides using a single-step electrodeposition technique. The bath was made up of a mixture of aqueous solutions of CuCl 2 , InCl 3 , and SeO 2 with acetonitrile (CH 3 CN) acting as a complexing agent. Voltametric studies suggest that acetonitrile is a suitable complexing agent, which helps in bringing the deposition potentials of Cu, In, and Se close to each other. The films were characterized by EDAX, SIMS, X-ray diffraction, and optical studies, which show that the material is CuInSe 2 , with a direct band gap of about 1 eV. The films were annealed in a Se atmosphere to improve their crystalline properties. X-ray diffractograms show that the peaks of CuInSe 2 , which are broad and of low intensity for as-grown films, become sharp and intense after annealing in Se atmosphere. SIMS depth profiles show that the films have a fairly uniform composition along the depth of the films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".