MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Threonine dehydrogenase is a minor degradative pathway of threonine catabolism in adult humans

2000· article· en· W2123309851 on OpenAlexaff
Pauline Darling, John E. Grunow, Mahroukh Rafii, Steve Brookes, Ronald O. Ball, Paul B. Pencharz

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreonineCatabolismBiochemistryChemistryBiologyEnzymeSerine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The threonine dehydrogenase (TDG) pathway is a significant route of threonine degradation, yielding glycine in experimental animals, but has not been accurately quantitated in humans. Therefore, the effect of a large excess of dietary threonine, given either as free amino acid (+Thr) or as a constituent of protein (+P-Thr), on threonine catabolism to CO(2) and to glycine was studied in six healthy adult males using a 4-h constant infusion of L-[1-(13)C]threonine and [(15)N]glycine. Gas chromatography-combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometry was used to determine [(13)C]glycine produced from labeled threonine. Threonine intakes were higher on +Thr and +P-Thr diets compared with control (126, 126, and 50 micromol x kg(-1) x h(-1), SD 8, P < 0.0001). Threonine oxidation to CO(2) increased threefold in subjects on +Thr and +P-Thr vs. control (49, 45, and 15 micromol x kg(-1) x h(-1), SD 6, P < 0.0001). Threonine conversion to glycine tended to be higher on +Thr and +P-Thr vs. control (3.5, 3.4, and 1.6 micromol x kg(-1) x h(-1), SD 1.3, P = 0.06). The TDG pathway accounted for only 7-11% of total threonine catabolism and therefore is a minor pathway in the human adult.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicMuscle metabolism and nutritionFrench-language works237,207