Glucan affinity of starch synthase IIa determines binding of starch synthase I and starch-branching enzyme IIb to starch granules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sugary-2 mutation in maize (Zea mays L.) is a result of the loss of catalytic activity of the endosperm-specific SS (starch synthase) IIa isoform causing major alterations to amylopectin architecture. The present study reports a biochemical and molecular analysis of an allelic variant of the sugary-2 mutation expressing a catalytically inactive form of SSIIa and sheds new light on its central role in protein-protein interactions and determination of the starch granule proteome. The mutant SSIIa revealed two amino acid substitutions, one being a highly conserved residue (Gly522→Arg) responsible for the loss of catalytic activity and the inability of the mutant SSIIa to bind to starch. Analysis of protein-protein interactions in sugary-2 amyloplasts revealed the same trimeric assembly of soluble SSI, SSIIa and SBE (starch-branching enzyme) IIb found in wild-type amyloplasts, but with greatly reduced activities of SSI and SBEIIb. Chemical cross-linking studies demonstrated that SSIIa is at the core of the complex, interacting with SSI and SBEIIb, which do not interact directly with each other. The sugary-2 mutant starch granules were devoid of amylopectin-synthesizing enzymes, despite the fact that the respective affinities of SSI and SBEIIb from sugary-2 for amylopectin were the same as observed in wild-type. The data support a model whereby granule-bound proteins involved in amylopectin synthesis are partitioned into the starch granule as a result of their association within protein complexes, and that SSIIa plays a crucial role in trafficking SSI and SBEIIb into the granule matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".