MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123327902 · doi:10.1029/2011sw000725

Chapman Conference on the Earth's radiation belts and inner magnetosphere

2011· article· en· W2123327902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. N. Baker, Danny Summers, I. R. Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Weather · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVan Allen radiation beltPlanetJupiter (rocket family)Van Allen ProbesPhysicsAstrobiologyAstronomyMars Exploration ProgramPlutoMagnetosphereSpace explorationGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Late in the evening on 31 January 1958, a Juno (Jupiter-C) rocket blasted into space, lofting the first U.S. artificial Earth satellite into orbit. This spacecraft, dubbed Explorer 1, joined in space one other satellite, Sputnik 2, which had been launched on 3 November 1957 by the Soviet Union. The Explorer 1 mission was groundbreaking, for it carried a small scientific payload prepared at the University of Iowa by a team of researchers led by James A. Van Allen. The instrumentation on Explorer 1 (and on the subsequently successful Explorer 3) would make the first truly revolutionary discovery of the space age, namely, that Earth is enshrouded in toroids, or belts, of extraordinarily high energy, high-intensity radiation. Van Allen and his team would go on to explore and map the radiation regions around the Earth in considerable detail. The radiation zones are today known in his honor as the Van Allen radiation belts. Van Allen would lead subsequent exploratory efforts (such as those on Pioneer 10 and 11) that would discover radiation zones around the giant magnetized planets Jupiter and Saturn. Moreover, Van Allen and colleagues would show the lack of persistent radiation belts around Mars and Venus, owing to these latter planets’ lack of strong intrinsic magnetic dipole fields. Since the seminal discovery by Van Allen and coworkers, the world scientific community has made huge strides not only in understanding the fundamental and cosmic significance of the radiation first measured in 1958 but also in recognizing its significance as a space weather threat to human technological systems in space. At an AGU Chapman Conference held 17–22 July 2011 in St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada, more than 110 researchers from more than 15 countries gathered to assess the state of radiation belt research. Despite more than 5 decades of radiation belt research, the Chapman Conference, entitled “Dynamics of the Earth's Radiation Belts and Inner Magnetosphere,” revealed a still vibrant interest in the particles, waves, and fields that form the physical basis of modern radiation belt science. The meeting was the first Chapman Conference dealing with space science topics to be held in Canada in more than 35 years. The meeting took place overlooking the harbor of St. John's and the beautiful narrows to the Atlantic Ocean, at a location within sight of Signal Hill, where Guglielmo Marconi first successfully received transatlantic wireless radio transmissions from Cornwall, England, in December 1901. The rugged coastline of Newfoundland provided a stunning backdrop for conference presentations and for the superb social program organized under the aegis of the Memorial University of Newfoundland. As the third nation in space, with the launch of the Alouette 1 satellite on 29 September 1962 and its 10 years of operation, Canada has a long heritage of space exploration. Hence, it was fitting that current advances in space radiation research be showcased in Canada; strong Canadian participation highlighted how Canadian space science and space weather research continues to play a major role in coordinated international endeavors. The program of plenary lectures, invited talks, contributed oral papers, and outstanding posters showed the exciting state of modern radiation belt research. Continuing analysis of data (see Figure 1) from such Earth-orbiting spacecraft as the Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES), the Solar Anomalous and Magnetospheric Particle Explorer (SAMPEX), Polar, and other active missions, as well as from physical modeling that is increasingly thorough and sophisticated, showed that radiation belt science is thriving. All eyes at the meeting were on new space missions now in development, such as the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) dual-spacecraft project of NASA, the Energization and Radiation in Geospace (ERG) mission of Japan, and the RESONANCE mission of Russia. These new spacecraft, all planned for launch within the next 2–3 years, should further revolutionize scientific understanding of Earth's radiation belts. The St. John's Chapman Conference effectively reminded all present not only of the exciting upcoming scientific opportunities in radiation belt research but also of the research's great practical significance. Spacecraft operating in low- and medium-altitude orbits around the Earth are constantly bombarded by Van Allen belt radiation. Numerous operational anomalies and outright failures of spacecraft systems and subsystems have been directly linked to radiation belt space weather episodes. The conference highlighted these space weather concerns and emphasized the need for better radiation belt forecasting and predictive understanding. Current outstanding issues in radiation belt science, which were well addressed at the conference, include modeling the transport, acceleration, and loss of radiation belt particles. Progress was reported on perfecting radiation belt models that combine the fundamental process of inward radial particle transport with local acceleration due to cyclotron resonance with whistler mode chorus. Recently, new mechanisms of electron energization have been discovered due to special forms of nonlinear phase trapping by coherent whistler mode waves that can accelerate electrons to megaelectron volt energies over much shorter time scales than those estimated by quasi-linear theory. How to appropriately incorporate such nonlinear processes in models that have traditionally relied on quasi-linear theory is a dilemma that was actively discussed at the conference. Another topic that received much attention was the crucial role played by particle losses in controlling the variability of the radiation belts. Dramatic depletions of the radiation belts seen at geosynchronous orbit and at lower altitudes are still not well understood. Particle losses result from precipitation due to pitch angle scattering into the atmospheric loss cone by plasma waves or loss through the magnetopause. Realistic modeling of the transport, acceleration, and loss of radiation belt particles requires at least a detailed knowledge of the magnetic field configuration during disturbed conditions, as well as spectral information on the relevant plasma wave modes with respect to magnetic local time and latitude. The impending satellite missions discussed at the conference are expected to contribute greatly to providing these important data. The more than 70 talks and 60 posters at the St. John's meeting will form the basis of a new AGU monograph on radiation belt and inner magnetosphere science. The conference conveners and authors of this report thank AGU, Memorial University of Newfoundland, the city of St. John's, the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, and NASA for the organizational and financial support that made the conference a huge success. The radiation belt community now looks forward to using this conference as a springboard to greater future successes from imminent new spacecraft missions. It will, indeed, be a fitting tribute to the pioneering efforts of Van Allen that this conference will light the way to a new level of understanding of the radiation regions that bear his name. D. Baker was supported by the National Science Foundation Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling. D. Summers and I. R. Mann acknowledge support from Discovery Grants of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. D. Summers also acknowledges support from World Class University grant R31-10016 from the Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. The authors thank S. G. Kanekal for the SAMPEX graphics and for useful discussions. Daniel N. Baker is director of the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics and professor of astrophysical and planetary sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder ([email protected]). Danny Summers is a University Research Professor at Memorial University of Newfoundland in St. John's, Canada. Ian R. Mann is a professor and the Canada Research Chair in Space Physics at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace WeatherSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207