Room-temperature NIR phosphorescence of new iridium (III) complexes with ligands derived from benzoquinoxaline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new series of new iridium (III) complexes (15) bearing ligands derived from benzoquinoxaline were designed and synthesized. X-ray structural analyses of 1 reveal a distorted octahedral geometry around the Ir atom in which the pyrazolate chelate is located opposite to the cis-oriented carbon donor atoms of benzoquinoxaline, while the benzoquinoxaline ligands adopt an eclipse configuration and their coordinated nitrogen atoms and carbon adopt trans- and cis-orientation, respectively. Complexes 15 exhibit moderate NIR phosphorescence with peak maxima located at around 910930 nm. As supported by the TDDFT approach, the transition mainly involves benzoquinoxaline 3 ππ* intraligand charge transfer (ILCT) and metal (Ir) to benzoquinoxaline charge transfer (MLCT) of which the spectroscopy and dynamics of relaxation have been thoroughly investigated. The relatively weak NIR emission can be tentatively rationalized by the low energy gap of which the radiationless deactivation may be governed by nearly temperature-independent, weak-bonding motions in combination with a minor channel incorporating small torsional motions associated with phenyl ring in the benzoquinoxaline sites.Key words: phosphorescence, NIR, iridium, benzoquinoxaline, isoquinoline, bipyridine, pyrazolate, acetylacetonate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".