Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of end-stage renal disease with dialysis is characterized by high mortality rate, low quality of life, and high cost. Recent randomized controlled studies showed that increasing the dialysis dose above the currently recommended levels in thrice-weekly hemodialysis does not decrease the patient mortality rate. Short daily hemodialysis or daily home nocturnal hemodialysis are promising alternatives. Both improve quality of life and control blood pressure and anemia; nocturnal hemodialysis additionally controls serum phosphates without phosphate binders, allows a free diet, and corrects sleep apnea. Although the direct cost of daily hemodialysis is higher than that of conventional hemodialysis, the cost of total care, especially when delivered at home, seems to be lower. Further confirmation of these results is important. Restructuring of the dialysis reimbursement system is necessary to make the use of daily hemodialysis possible. Hemofiltration techniques, sorbents, and the renal tubular assist device may also help change the current grim statistics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it