Appointing the Level of Individual Entrepreneurship of Islamic Azad University Students (Specifically Studying the Students of Cultural Management at the Science & Research Branch of the Islamic Azad University)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entrepreneurship is initially about seeking opportunities and then seeking the needed resources. An organization which is poor in entrepreneurial activities is often poor in supplying the organization with opportunities. Those organizations seeking progress must understand what helps opportunities manifest.This research aims to appoint the level of individual entrepreneurship of students studying Cultural Management at the Science & Research Branch of the I.A.U to help understand the significance of the main factors of individual entrepreneurship which are risk-taking, requiring success, having an internal control center, creativity tendency, needing independence, tolerating uncertainty, prognostication and being a good conversationalist. The research is functional, goal wise, and a questionnaire has been used as a data collecting tool. The results from the research questions showed that the level of individual entrepreneurship of students studying Cultural Management at the Science & Research Branch of the Islamic Azad University was estimated to be good, but still far from the desired level. Some of the most important findings of this research are as it follows: there is a reverse relation between the factors of risk-taking, needing independence & tolerating uncertainty and gender; there is a reverse relation between the factors of risk-taking & requiring success and age which means that the older the students become, the more reduction of the factors; there is a direct relation between factors of having an internal control center, tolerating uncertainty & being a good conversationalist and age; and no meaningful relation is seen between creativity tendency and age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".