Propuesta de enseñanza del Tenis de Mesa en Educación Primaria y Secundaria (Proposal to the table tennis teaching in primary and secondary school)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El Tenis de Mesa es un deporte que cada vez se practica más en todo el mundo, tanto en el campo federativo y competitivo como en el educativo y recreativo. La utilización, cada vez más frecuente, del Tenis de Mesa como contenido en las clases de Educación Física en centros de enseñanza Primaria y Secundaria, hace que cobre especial importancia su adecuada enseñanza, puesto que a través de su práctica se puede formar a la persona en los distintos ámbitos: motor, afectivo, cognitivo y social. Enseñanza que, en nuestra opinión, debe partir de las características del deporte y de sus potencialidades educativas, aunque como es bien sabido, el deporte puede ser, o no, educativo, dependiendo de la utilización que hagamos del mismo. Por lo que, y siguiendo a Tabernero, Márquez, y Llanos (2002), la figura clave de la iniciación deportiva va a ser el técnico/profesor. Por este motivo, abogamos por una práctica educativa del Tenis de Mesa.Abstract: The table tennis is a sport which is practised increasingly in the world, so much in the federative and competitive fields as educative and recreative ones. The frequent use of the table tennis as content in the physical education lessons makes that its suitable teaching receives special importance, because with its practice we can educate people in different fields: motor, affective, cognitive and social. We think that this teaching must begin from characteristics of the sport and its educational possibilities, even though, as it is known, sport can be, or not, educative, depending on the use that we made of it. Following to Tabernero, Márquez, y Llanos (2002), the main person will be the coach/teacher in the sports initiation. For this reason we defend an educational practice of the table tennis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".