MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123397811 · doi:10.12968/bjcn.2012.17.8.364

Faecal incontinence in the elderly: issues and interventions in the home

2012· review· en· W2123397811 on OpenAlexaff
Warren Gillibrand

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Community Nursing · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDignityPsychological interventionPresentation (obstetrics)Urinary incontinenceQuality of life (healthcare)NursingGerontologyIntensive care medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses current evidence-based guidelines for the management of faecal incontinence in the elderly. The key aspects of maintaining dignity, quality of life and self-esteem are addressed within a presentation of good assessment, prevention, management and treatment principles. Particular focus is given to the added problems that faecal incontinence may bring to the elderly person suffering with this debilitating, and often embarrassing condition. The increased risk to skin integrity is discussed, with reference to available guidance to help nurses manage the risk of skin breakdown associated with persistent faecal incontinence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Community NursingSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207