Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iceland is an emerging tourist destination with a huge growth in tourist arrivals where wilderness as an importantpart of the attraction.But visitors travel into wilderness to experience naturalness and solitude so whenwilderness becomes a popular tourist destination these qualities are difficult to preserve. This research builds onquestionnaire surveys gathered among 3941 travelers at nine areas in the Highlands of Iceland where the aimwas to explore to what extent travelers experience wilderness in the Highlands of Iceland and whether theyexperience that the carrying capacity of the destinations in the Highlands has been reached. It furthermorediscusses the possible use limits of wilderness as an arena for tourism.The results show that despite substantialhuman influence travelers experience wilderness. Most travelers consider the number of tourists appropriate,although some warning signs are emerging as 40% of tourists consider that there are too many tourists in one ofthe areas. Visitors prefer simplicity and wish to keep the places as natural as possible, with one exception at themost visited destination. There the attitudes of visitors are more anthropocentric, favoring more humanizedlandscape and service. Using wilderness as a tourism product is a very challenging task in an emergingdestination where tourism growth is as fast as it is in Iceland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".