MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123422291

Introduction aux thérapies continues de remplacement rénal et principes d’ajustement des posologies des médicaments

2004· article· fr· W2123422291 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Julie Frenette, David Williamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resume Objectif : Le present article vise a introduire les notions de base sur les therapies continues de remplacement renal et propose des methodes d’ajustement posologique des medicaments. Source des donnees : Une revue de litterature a ete effectuee a l’aide de Pubmed (2004) en employant les mots « hemofiltration, antibiotique, soins intensifs, clairance ». Selection des etudes et extraction des donnees : Toutes les etudes concernant l’ajustement des antibiotiques cites dans l’article ont ete revues et l’information pertinente concernant les therapies continues de remplacement renal a ete incluse. Analyse des donnees : L’insuffisance renale aigue est une complication frequente chez les patients de soins critiques. L’hemofiltration est de plus en plus souvent utilisee. Cependant, peu de donnees completes sur l’ajustement des medicaments avec cette technique sont disponibles dans la litterature. Conclusion : Les donnees publiees dans la litterature ne peuvent etre extrapolees. L’ajustement de la posologie des medicaments doit etre individualise. Le choix de la methode d’ajustement releve du jugement clinique. Abstract Objective : This article presents the basis to understand continuous renal replacement therapies and proposes different methods for drug adjustment. Methods : A literature search was performed using Pubmed with the following words « hemofiltration, antibiotics, critical care, clearance ». All studies reporting data on antibiotics adjustment with continuous renal replacement therapies were reviewed and information on these therapies was included in the review. Results : Acute renal failure commonly complicates the course of hospitalisation for intensive care unit patients. Hemofiltration is becoming a treatment of choice to treat these patients. However, few data are available regarding drug adjustment in this context. Conclusions : Data regarding drug adjustment with hemofiltration cannot be easily applied to patients in clinical practice. Individualised regimens are often more appropriate. Clinical judgement is needed to choose the best adjustment method. Key words : Continuous renal replacement therapies, drug adjustement, acute renal failure, pharmacokinetics, critical care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207