MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123424645 · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2008.4922827

Beyond the curves: Modeling the electrical efficiency of photovoltaic inverters

2008· article· en· W2123424645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)InverterVoltageSimplicityPower (physics)Function (biology)Electronic engineeringSoftwareElectrical efficiencyReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been noted that the models typically used to represent inverters in simulation and design tools at the present are inadequate because they do not capture the variations in electrical efficiency over the full range of operating conditions. Data to develop more detailed models have been scarce in the past, but are now increasingly available from multiple sources, therefore it is time to rectify the situation. This paper examines efficiency measurements for a wide range of different inverter products at multiple power levels and input voltages. A model is developed that expresses efficiency as a function of both power and voltage, and it is demonstrated that this model can approximate the efficiency with an appropriate level of accuracy using a small number of parameters. This combination of accuracy and simplicity should facilitate implementation in software and dissemination of model parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it