MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123428019 · doi:10.1071/bt04202

Germination and dormancy states of seeds in the environmental weed Rumex vesicarius (Polygonaceae). II. Germination and dormancy of seeds enclosed within the fruit

2006· article· en· W2123428019 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Schatral, J. M. Osborne

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Botany · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed Germination and Physiology
Canadian institutionsImmunoPrecise (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationDormancyBiologyPolygonaceaeRumexWeedPerianthBotanySeed dormancyPolygonumAgronomyPlant ecologyStamenEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rumex vesicarius (Ruby dock; subgenus Acetosa, section Vesicarii, family Polygonaceae) shows fascinating ways of controlling and staggering seed germination throughout the year. Seeds within the large inflated fruiting valves (fruits) display variations in their ability to germinate, which are related to the time of the year and depend on the presence of light. Perianth-imposed dormancy appears to undergo one distinct seasonal cycle under laboratory conditions. Our results suggest that germination is best during the autumn and winter months but poor during the rest of the year. In the natural environment (fruits either remain on the soil surface or are buried) dormancy release may be occurring several times during the year under appropriate light, temperature and moisture conditions. Preliminary experiments indicate that the fruiting valves produce chemical substances that inhibit seed germination, and their break down appears to be affected by light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of BotanySame topicSeed Germination and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207