MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123457598 · doi:10.7202/022639ar

La Baie James. Les dessous d’une rencontre que la bureaucratie n’avait pas prévue.

2005· article· fr· W2123457598 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Guy Mercier, Gilles Ritchot

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité LavalInstitute of Indigenous Peoples' Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1994, le gouvernement québécois annonça l'abandon du mégaprojet hydroélectrique Grande Baleine. Plusieurs raisons furent invoquées: resserrement de la demande, recul du marché extérieur, pression de lobbies écologistes et autochtones. Pour interpréter le phénomène, cet article examine le jugement Malouf (1973), renversé en Cour d'appel et suivi, en 1975, de la Convention de la Baie James et du Nord québécois . Toujours en vigueur, ce traité suscite aujourd'hui la controverse. Pour en saisir la pleine signification cependant, il convient de s'en tenir à sa lettre et à son esprit plutôt qu'aux attaques dirigées contre lui. Nous pouvons alors déceler les prémisses d'une rencontre politique entre Autochtones et Québécois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.030
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de géographie du QuébecSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207