Unstructured meshing for two asset barrier options
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discretely observed barriers introduce discontinuities in the solution of two asset option pricing partial differential equations (PDEs) at barrier observation dates. Consequently, an accurate solution of the pricing PDE requires a fine mesh spacing near the barriers. Non-rectangular barriers pose difficulties for finite difference methods using structured meshes. It is shown that the finite element method (FEM) with standard unstructured meshing techniques can lead to significant efficiency gains over structured meshes with a comparable number of vertices. The greater accuracy achieved with unstructured meshes is shown to more than compensate for a greater solve time due to an increase in sparse matrix condition number. Results are presented for a variety of barrier shapes, including rectangles, ellipses, and rotations of these shapes. It is claimed that ellipses best represent constant (risk neutral) probability regions of underlying asset price-point movement, and are thus natural two-dimensional barrier shapes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it