MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123520859 · doi:10.1177/0013164407313371

Note on a Confidence Interval for the Squared Semipartial Correlation Coefficient

2008· article· en· W2123520859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational and Psychological Measurement · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicPsychometric Methodologies and Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatisticsConfidence intervalPercentileMathematicsCoverage probabilityCorrelation coefficientSample size determinationCorrelationMean squared errorRegression analysisLinear regressionInterval (graph theory)Combinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A squared semipartial correlation coefficient (ΔR 2 ) is the increase in the squared multiple correlation coefficient that occurs when a predictor is added to a multiple regression model. Prior research has shown that coverage probability for a confidence interval constructed by using a modified percentile bootstrap method with ΔR 2 was generally good with sample sizes that should not be too challenging for educational and psychological researchers. However, that research was limited to values of Δρ 2 = .00 or Δρ 2 ≥ .05. The present research investigates coverage probability when .01 ≤ Δρ 2 ≤ .04 and shows that the modified percentile bootstrap typically results in coverage probability in the [.925, .975] interval for a 95% confidence interval, provided the sample size is at least 50 if the number of predictors in the model with more predictors (i.e., the full model) is four or smaller, at least 150 if the number of predictors in the full model is five or six, and at least 200 and preferably 250 if the number of predictors in the full model is between seven and nine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.744
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it