Harrison, Orphism and Cambridge [review of Annabel Robinson, <i>The Life and Work of Jane Ellen Harrison</i>]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
nnabel Robinson thinks Jane Harrison (-) "deserves to be better Aknown than she is" (p.).Robinson's biography, well-argued and highly readable, may begin to remedy that historical injustice.Classicists will eagerly scan Robinson's discussion of a scholar whose views on Greek religion and civilization still produce controversy.On another hand, enthusiasts of literary and social Bloomsbury will find much to occupy them, as the volume is speckled with sub-narratives of Harrison's friendships with Leonard and Virginia Woolf, Roger Fry, Clive Bell, and Lytton Strachey (whose sister Pernel also taught and administered at Cambridge University's Newnham College and was Fellow and later Principal, -). Suzara does include "A Complete List of Bertrand Russell's Books", but it is not as complete as Suzara thinks.Indeed, on page of the text Suzara cites a Russell anthology not included in his list at the end.Suzara also provides a brief and highly selective list of books about Russell, marred most conspicuously by the claim that Katharine Tait's My Father Bertrand Russell was edited by Ralph Schoenman (p.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".