Removing volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from a printed circuit board manufacturing facility using pilot‐ and commercial‐scale biofilters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper describes a new application of biofiltration technology to treat emissions from a printed circuit board manufacturing facility. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), primarily Propylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether Acetate (PGMEA), di‐ Propylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether (di‐PGME), and 1‐3‐5 triazine‐2‐4‐6 triamine, are emitted during solder masking and drying of printed circuit boards. These VOCs are odorous and, hence, require treatment prior to discharge. Recently, based on data from a laboratory‐pilot biofiltration study, a 7,500 cfm capacity commercial biofilter (BASYS™) system was installed to treat odorous VOCs at a printed circuit board facility located in the Greater Toronto area. The biofilter system, which consists of two units, was packed with wood‐based (BIOMIX™) and inorganic (BIOSORBENS™) media, respectively. The biofilter system commenced operation in August of 2000. Air and media samples have been continuously collected and analyzed for monitoring and fine‐tuning of the biofilter (BASYS) system. As predicted from the laboratory‐pilot tests, results from the commercial system indicate that the biofilter unit, which contains propriety inorganic media, outperforms wood based media. While completely eliminating targeted odorous compounds such as PGMEA, the biofilter system is also shown to remove non‐target VOCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".