MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123533186 · doi:10.1109/aiccsa.2005.1387047

Optimal multi-class guard channel admission policy under hard handoff constraints

2005· article· en· W2123533186 on OpenAlexaff
Nidal Nasser, Hossam S. Hassanein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHandoverComputer scienceQuality of serviceComputer networkCall Admission ControlMarkov decision processGuard (computer science)Channel (broadcasting)WirelessMarkov processAdmission controlWireless networkTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. In this paper we present a call admission control (CAC) policy for multimedia services that characterize the next generation of wireless cellular networks. The well-known CAC guard-channel policy is modified to maintain a pre-specified level of quality of services for multimedia calls. A semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) is used to represent the multi-class guard channel CAC policy with constraints on the dropping probabilities of multimedia handoff calls. The SMDP is formulated as a linear programming problem with the objectives of maximizing the system utilization and guaranteeing QoS of multiple classes of handoff calls with each class having particularly different QoS requirements. We show numerically that the multi-class guard channel policy deploying SMDP outperforms the existing upper-limit CAC policy as it improves the service quality by maximizing the bandwidth utilization while stratifying the quality of service constraint to upper bound of the handoff dropping probability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207