MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123578281 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2005.1543366

Flexible Channel Feedback Quantization in Multiple Antenna Systems

2005· article· en· W2123578281 on OpenAlexaff
Bartosz Mielczarek, Witold A. Krzymień

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodebookChannel state informationMIMOFadingTransmitterQuantization (signal processing)PrecodingComputer scienceCovarianceControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)Channel capacityVector quantizationAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsWirelessStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new vector quantization (VQ) algorithm for reducing the bit rate used for channel state information feedback in a variety of multiple antenna systems on flat and frequency selective channels. We consider an approach where the receiver chooses an instantaneous capacity maximizing entry from a small finite set of predefined covariance matrices. The codebook of covariance matrices is constructed based on separate optimization of the channel eigenvectors and power allocation among them. If, for the given channel realization, one of the predefined covariance matrices provides higher capacity than equal power distribution, the indices of the two codebooks are fed to the transmitter; otherwise, the transmitter uses the open-loop approach. We implement the proposed algorithm on flat fading and frequency selective MIMO channels and show the influence of the feedback rate on system capacity. For the case of flat fading, the required feedback rates are approximately equal to the product of the number of transmit and receive antennas. Although much higher feedback throughput is needed for reliable channel state information feedback in OFDM systems, we show a simple clustering technique to lower the required bit rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207