MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123578840 · doi:10.1081/dis-200040234

Asphaltene Self‐Association

2005· article· en· W2123578840 on OpenAlexaff
Harvey W. Yarranton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dispersion Science and Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneChemistryAlkylMonomerAlkaneStackingOrganic chemistryHeteroatomMolar massChemical engineeringHydrocarbonPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent characterizations of asphaltene structures suggest that asphaltene monomers may consist of several small polynuclear aromatic clusters linked by alkyl chains and containing a variety of heteroatoms. This structure lends itself to the view that asphaltenes self‐associate in a manner analogous to oligimerization rather than simple stacking. If asphaltenes are assumed to be oligimers, some of the interesting features of asphaltene behavior can be explained in a self‐consistent approach, including: measured changes of asphaltene molar mass in different solvents and at different temperatures; the precipitation of asphaltenes from alkane‐diluted heavy oils; and the interfacial behavior of asphaltenes. Recent work in these areas indicates that asphaltene monomers are in the order of 1000 to 2000 g/mol and that self‐associated asphaltenes consist of two to six monomers per aggregate on average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dispersion Science and TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207