MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123600992 · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpt092

A hot and dry future: warming effects on boreal tree drought tolerance

2013· letter· en· W2123600992 on OpenAlexafffund
Danielle A. Way, Catherine Crawley, Rowan F. Sage

Bibliographic record

VenueTree Physiology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConnaught FundUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsGlobal warmingBorealClimate changeEnvironmental scienceDrought toleranceTaigaTree (set theory)BiologyEcologyAgronomyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By 2100, climate change is predicted to warm high-latitude summers by 3–8 °C (ACIA 2005, Christensen et al. 2007). High temperatures will become more common in the boreal region and, in the absence of significantly increased precipitation, drought frequency and intensity will increase. Much of the North American boreal consists of forests dominated by black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.), a major timber crop that dominates frequently flooded soils, but has shallow roots (<20 cm deep) and therefore experiences drought stress in the absence of frequent rain (Viereck and Johnston 1990). Black spruce growth is negatively impacted by heat, due in part to rapid soil drying from greater evapotranspiration (ACIA 2005, Angert et al. 2005). Increased temperatures and drought potentially threaten the dominance of black spruce in the boreal forest, and have been identified as major causes for the sharp increases in mortality rate of boreal tree species, including black spruce, that have occurred in North America since the 1960s (Peng et al. 2011). Experiments investigating the response of black spruce to warming and drought provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie the reduced growth and increased mortality seen in this species in the field. Growth at elevated temperatures reduces the carbon balance of black spruce seedlings, which in turn limits growth, as well as reducing the root to shoot ratio, which may make trees more prone to drought stress (Way and Sage 2008a, 2008b, Way et al. 2011). Stomatal closure appears to be the main mechanism by which black spruce avoids lethal water stress (Blake and Li 2003), with conductance declining at relatively high leaf water potentials (−0.25 MPa) and complete closure observed below −1.5 MPa (Grossnickle and Blake 1986, Eastman and Camm 1995, Dang et al. 1997). However, by reducing stomatal conductance to prevent water loss, seedlings substantially reduce their ability to assimilate carbon, which may further exacerbate heat-related growth declines. In this issue of Tree Physiology, Balducci et al. (2013) look at how water stress affects xylem formation, gas exchange and survival in black spruce seedlings grown at elevated temperatures of +2 °C and +5 °C above the ambient. While a 32-day drought reduced stomatal conductance and photosynthesis, there was little evidence for an effect of temperature on these leaf-level parameters, which rapidly recovered fully after rewatering. But warming did alter the impact of drought on seedling survival: over 12% of the drought-stressed spruce died in the warmest treatment, compared with 2% in the ambient temperature environment. The drought also affected xylem formation over the season. When water was resupplied to the drought-stressed, ambient temperature-grown spruce had similar cambial activity to the ambient temperature, watered seedlings after 2 weeks of recovery. But growth at elevated temperatures delayed recovery of cambial activity for an extra 2 weeks, and reduced wood density. Overall, the effect of drought was much stronger than that of increased growth temperatures on the parameters examined, although the delayed recovery of growth and increased mortality from water stress at elevated temperatures implies that seedlings that develop in a warmer climate may be more vulnerable to drought. While the cause of increased drought-related mortality in warm-grown spruce in Balducci et al. (2013) is unknown, it echoes recent trends seen in forest stands (Peng et al. 2011) and lends support to the concept that combined increases in heat and drought are responsible for rising mortality in boreal species. However, there is some good news as well. The similarity in the development of and recovery from leaf-level stress across growth temperatures seen in Balducci et al. (2013) is encouraging, as it indicates that warming alone may not exacerbate water stress-induced damage to photosynthesis and leaf function. In fact, there are reasons to think that warming may even increase drought tolerance of photosynthesis. Exposure to high temperatures often increases the heat stability of photosystem II (PSII; Havaux 1993), through mechanisms such as chaperone protein expression (i.e., heat shock proteins; Vierling 1991), or changes in thylakoid membrane composition (Sharkey 2005). Water stress can induce similar protective mechanisms, such as an increased degree of saturation in thylakoid membrane lipids (Ferrari-Iliou et al. 1984, Prabha et al. 1985) and heat-shock protein expression (Ristic et al. 1998), so that drought increases the thermal stability of PSII (Havaux 1992, Ladjal et al. 2000). If the interaction between water stress and heat stress is reciprocal, and is due to similar physiological mechanisms, exposure to high temperatures should lead to greater drought tolerance (e.g., Yordanov et al. 1999). Could warming help mitigate the effect of drought stress in black spruce needles? Figure 1 shows the effect of an elevated growth temperature treatment of 8 °C on the response of black spruce seedlings to drought (see figure legend for experimental details). In the drought treatment, leaf relative water content (RWC) declined linearly with shoot pre-dawn water potential (ΨPD); there was no difference in the response of RWC to ΨPD between growth temperatures (Figure 1A). But high temperature-grown trees maintained a higher maximum yield of PSII (measured as the dark-adapted ratio of variable to maximal chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm)) for a given ΨPD in the drought treatment than trees from ambient temperatures (Figure 1B). Since Fv/Fm is relatively insensitive to drought and only declines when water stress becomes severe (Epron and Dryer 1992, Havaux 1992, Eastman and Camm 1995, Iijima et al. 2006, Ditmarova et al. 2010), this implies that the photosynthetic apparatus of leaves from elevated temperatures was more tolerant of low ΨPD than trees grown at current temperatures. By the time declines in Fv/Fm were detected, about 50% of the needles on a seedling were brown, verifying that trees were extremely stressed. This concurs with Ditmarova et al. (2010), who also found that Fv/Fm did not decline in water-stressed spruce until just before the seedlings died. Effects of elevated growth temperatures on leaf physiological parameters under drought stress. A total of 350 1-year old black spruce seedlings were grown for 3 months in 3.8-l pots filled with peat moss in each of two climate-controlled greenhouses with vapour pressure deficits of 1.4–1.7 kPa. The ambient-temperature (AT) room was set to 22/16 °C day/night temperatures to mimic conditions from the seed provenance site; the high-temperature (HT) room was set to 30/22 °C. Water was then withheld from half of the seedlings in each room (drought treatment) for 40 days; the other half continued to receive ample water. Drought tolerance of photosynthesis was measured on six seedlings per treatment per day using the Fv/Fm on dark-adapted needles (PAM-101, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). Immediately afterward, whole shoot ΨPD was measured with a pressure chamber (PMS Instruments, Corvallis, OR, USA) and the leaf RWC was assessed. Figures show the relationship between ΨPD and (A) RWC, and (B) Fv/Fm, in well-watered (circles) and drought-treated (triangles) spruce grown at AT (filled symbols and solid lines) or HT (open symbols and dashed lines). Means ± SE, n = 2–6. In (A), no difference between treatments (P = 0.18), long-dashed line fit to all data: r2 = 0.84; (B) significant difference between growth temperatures (P < 0.0001), solid line fit to AT: r2 = 0.93; short-dashed line fit to HT: r2 = 0.87. With climate warming, it is probable that intense drought will increase in the boreal forest, if for no other reason than accelerated evapotranspiration, and temperatures equivalent to the warming used by Balducci et al. (2013) will become common (ACIA 2005, Christensen et al. 2007). These higher temperatures may enhance leaf-level drought tolerance in black spruce, reducing the ΨPD where severe photosynthetic stress occurs (Figure 1B), and they do not appear to aggravate drought-induced damage of leaf function (Balducci et al. 2013). This could be significant, because drought in the boreal is often short-term in duration, developing rapidly in the gap between summer rains (Larsen 1980). More studies on how drought stress and temperature interact are needed to improve our ability to predict how elevated growth temperatures and drought will affect ecologically and economically important species such as black spruce. Also, multi-factor experiments that examine the combined effects of rising temperatures and CO2 concentrations on drought stress in trees, such as recent work by Duan et al. (2013) and Lewis et al. (2013), are key for making realistic predictions of tree responses to future climate scenarios. Given the recent increase in tree mortality due to climate-related drought stress (Adams et al. 2010, Allen et al. 2010), particularly in unmanaged boreal forest stands (Peng et al. 2011), determining how key tree species will cope with drought in the future is a critically important research question. This work was supported by a University of Toronto Centre for Global Change Studies summer scholarship to C.C., an NSERC PGS-B, PDF and Discovery grant to D.A.W., and an NSERC Discovery and Strategic grant to R.F.S. We thank Darcy McElveny and Brandon Connors from Pacific Regeneration Technology for donating the seedlings used in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0160.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTree PhysiologySame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207