MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123601085 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2015-0083

Vitamin D, phosphate, and vasculotoxicity

2015· review· en· W2123601085 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ronald B. Brown, Afrozul Haq, Charles F. Stanford, Mohammed S. Razzaque

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of KansasHarvard School of Dental Medicine
KeywordsCalcificationVitamin D and neurologyKidney diseaseMedicineDiabetes mellitusEctopic calcificationCalciumVascular diseaseInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhosphateVitaminCalcinosisVascular tissueChemistryBiologyBiochemistryBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vascular calcification is a complex process that results in the ectopic deposition of calcium-phosphate hydroxyapatite. Medial and intimal vascular calcification is frequently present in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (CKD), and markedly increases the morbidity and mortality of these patients. Increased serum levels of calcium and phosphate, along with the use of active vitamin D metabolites, are commonly implicated in the evolvement of vascular wall mineralization in CKD patients. Because CKD patients have lower serum levels of vitamin D, they are routinely prescribed vitamin D supplements that exert a dualistic role that is both healthful and harmful in these patients, perhaps protecting bone health, but at the expense of promoting vascular pathology. This review briefly explains how reducing the phosphate burden in CKD patients could minimize vitamin-D-associated vascular wall calcification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207