MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123607105 · doi:10.1109/58.818753

Conductance measurements on a leaky SAW harmonic one-port resonator

2000· article· en· W2123607105 on OpenAlexaff
P.J. Edmonson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)McMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorAcousticsHarmonicPort (circuit theory)Harmonic analysisPhysicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringOpticsOptoelectronicsEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conductance measurements are reported on a leaky SAW (LSAW) harmonic one-port resonator on a 64 degrees Y-X LiNbO(3) substrate. This employed a short three-finger IDT for fundamental and second harmonic operation together with long reflection gratings. Conductances were measured with and without the end gratings. From an analysis of the measurements, it was deduced that, for optimum second harmonic performance, the grating stop-band frequency should be higher than the IDT unperturbed center frequency. This result is in contrast to fundamental frequency resonator designs in which the end grating stop-band frequency is placed below the IDT center frequency for optimum performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207