PENGARUH PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN PETA KONSEP TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP KOLOID SISWA KELAS XI SMAN 2 MATARAM TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan pembelajaran peta konsep terhadap pemahaman konsep koloid siswa kelas XI SMAN 2 Mataram tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Hasil belajar dalam penelitian ini meliputi hasil belajar dalam bentuk pengetahuan dan data hasil observasi aktifitas siswa sebagai data penunjang. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi experimental dengan populasi yaitu siswa kelas XI IPA 5 sampai dengan XI IPA 8 SMAN 2 Mataram tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik random sampling untuk populasi dalam unit kelas. Kelas yang dijadikan sampel adalah kelas XI IPA 5 sebagai kelas kontrol yang menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional (ceramah) dan kelas XI IPA 6 sebagai kelas eksperimen yang menggunakan pembelajaran peta konsep. Data diperoleh dengan menggunakan pretest yang dilakukan di awal pembelajaran dan posttest yang dilaksanakan pada pertemuan akhir untuk menghitung tingkat kepahaman siswa melalui N-gain. Uji stastistik yang digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis adalah uji Mann Whitney dengan pendekatan kurva normal Z yang dilakukan pada data N-gain. Data kedua kelas menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kepahaman siswa kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol berada pada kategori sedang, yaitu 5.08. Hasil uji hipotesis N-gain pada taraf signifikan 5% diperoleh Zhitung (0,04) < Ztabel (1,96) yang berarti Ho pada penelitian ini diterima atau Ha ditolak. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan pembelajaran peta konsep tidak berpengaruh lebih baik terhadap pemahaman konsep koloid siswa kelas XI SMAN 2 Mataram tahun ajaran 2013/2014.Kata Kunci: Peta Konsep, Pemahaman Konsep, Koloid Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of the application of the concept map of learning students' to understanding the concept colloid class XI SMAN 2 Mataram academic year 2013/2014. Learning outcomes in this study include learning of knowledge and observation data from the student activities as supporting data. This study is a quasi experimental design, with the populations are students from class XI IPA 5 to XI IPA 8 of SMAN 2 Mataram academic year 2013/2014. Sampling was done with a random sampling technique to the population in the unit class. Sampled class is a class XI IPA 5 as a control class that uses the conventional learning (lectures) and class XI IPA 6 as an experimental class that uses the learning concept maps. Data obtained using a pretest conducted in early learning and posttests were carried out at the end of the meeting to calculate the level of student understanding through the N-gain. Statistical test is used to test the hypothesis is Mann Whitney test with normal curve approach is performed on the data Z N-gain. The data indicate that both classes of understanding students' grade level experimental and control classes in middle category, which is 5,08. The results of the N-gain hypothesis test at significance level of 5% was obtained Zhitung (0,04)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".