MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123634162 · doi:10.2113/econgeo.110.1.173

Controls on the Distribution of Gallium in the Nechalacho REE Deposit, NWT, Canada

2014· article· en· W2123634162 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. Timofeev, Anthony E. Williams‐Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalliumGeochemistryGeologyDistribution (mathematics)ChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the numerous industrial and scientific applications of gallium, its behavior in nature and the processes that concentrate it to potentially economic levels are poorly understood. Although the main supply of this metal is as a by-product of the mining of bauxite, it is also concentrated by magmatic-hydrothermal processes in peralkaline igneous systems. Here we report the results of a study of the distribution of gallium and the controls on this distribution in the Nechalacho rare metal deposit, Northwest Territories, Canada, which has been shown to contain significant reserves of this critical metal. Electron microprobe analyses and X-ray element maps of gallium-bearing minerals were used to determine the mineralogical distribution of gallium in the Nechalacho intrusive suite. Elevated gallium concentrations were identified in albite, biotite, orthoclase, chlorite, and allanite. Of these aluminum-bearing minerals, the most important hosts of gallium are albite, biotite, and orthoclase. Ferric iron-bearing minerals, including magnetite and aegirine, which were considered potential candidates for gallium sequestration, contain relatively low concentrations of the metal. This behavior of gallium, at least from a magmatic perspective, is consistent with its predicted partitioning between phenocrysts and melt. However, there is also evidence that gallium was redistributed by hydrothermal fluids. Chloritization of biotite resulted in the enrichment of gallium in the secondary mineral (chlorite), and the development of secondary albite (albitization) led to a depletion of gallium in primary albite. On the basis of these results, we argue that the overall distribution of gallium within the Nechalacho deposit was controlled by magmatic crystal fractionation, whereas hydrothermal processes led to local remobilization of the metal. During fractional crystallization, gallium was moderately compatible in minerals such as albite and biotite, whereas it bordered between compatibility and incompatibility in minerals such as magnetite and orthoclase, and was incompatible in aegirine. This resulted in a relatively constant bulk gallium concentration in the Nechalacho deposit, although locally, gallium was remobilized hydrothermally, particularly within the most altered parts of the intrusion, notably, the albitite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207