MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123660632 · doi:10.1152/jn.00908.2009

Recovery of Motoneuron Output Is Delayed in Old Men Following High-Intensity Fatigue

2009· article· en· W2123660632 on OpenAlexaff
Brian H. Dalton, Brad Harwood, Andrew W. Davidson, Charles L. Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseTriceps surae muscleMedicineSoleus musclePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMotor unitMuscle fatigueContraction (grammar)Internal medicineMuscle contractionElectromyographyCardiologySkeletal muscleAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite an age-related slowing in the contractile properties of the triceps surae, inherently low maximal motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) in the soleus are unchanged. Fatigue following high-intensity contractions is characterized by contractile slowing in conjunction with a reduction in MUFRs in young adults. Here we exploit the ageing model of the soleus to assess changes in neuromuscular function during fatigue and short-term recovery. We hypothesize that a high-intensity sustained contraction will cause minimal reductions in MUFRs in young and old subjects but that recovery of MUFRs will be delayed in aged subjects. We compared the effects of a high-intensity sustained task on the MUFRs of the soleus and triceps surae contractile properties in six young (approximately 24 yr) and six old (approximately 75 yr) men. Various measures of the contractile function of the triceps surae were tested during two to six sessions via maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) and tibial nerve stimulation. Populations of MUFR trains were recorded from the soleus during brief (approximately 7 s) MVCs, a high-intensity (75% MVC) sustained fatiguing task, and brief MVCs following task failure at 1, 2, 5, and 10 min. Old men had greater time to task failure than the young (approximately 138 and approximately 100 s, respectively). Voluntary activation was near maximal (>99%) for all subjects but at task failure, decreased to approximately 89% in both groups. Maximal MUFRs, for both groups, were reduced by approximately 44% and twitch contraction duration slowed by approximately 30% following task failure. Contraction duration recovered equally for both groups within 2 min, but maximal MUFRs did not recover until 5 min in the old compared with 1 min for the young. The surprising fatigue-induced reduction in MUFRs was similar for both groups, but despite a similar recovery of contractile properties for both, recovery of MUFRs was impaired in the old subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207