MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123723258 · doi:10.1109/qsic.2009.21

Web Traversal with a History Stack

2009· article· en· W2123723258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperlinkComputer scienceWeb pageTraverseTree traversalWeb testingWorld Wide WebHTML5Web navigationWeb applicationStatic web pageInformation retrievalWeb developmentWeb application securityProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correct navigational behavior of a web application is essential to its reliability. An effective means to improve our confidence in the correct behavior of a web application is to test it by exploring the possible navigation among the webpages at client side: The tester carries out the testing by consecutively clicking the hyperlinks along with some possible search parameters and checking whether the returned webpages are as expected. This type of client-side testing can be viewed as a traverse in a graph representing the considered webpages together with the hyperlinks among them. To reach an efficient test that traverses all hyperlinks considered, we make use of the interface provided by web browsers, typically, the goto menu. In doing so, the issues raised by cookies and URL rewriting are taken into account. Compared to the case without using the interface of web browsers, our experiments show a 17%-24% saving on the test sequence lengths in most cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it