MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123723570 · doi:10.1109/pes.2004.1373020

Entirely harmonic domain calculation of multiphase nonsinusoidal steady state

2004· article· en· W2123723570 on OpenAlexafffund
Taku Noda, A. Semlyen, Reza Iravani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsJacobian matrix and determinantHarmonicNonlinear systemFrequency domainControl theory (sociology)InitializationSteady state (chemistry)Computer scienceHarmonic analysisHarmonic balanceTransient (computer programming)Topology (electrical circuits)MathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. This paper proposes an algorithm for obtaining the periodic steady-state solution of a multiphase network including nonlinear, switching, and frequency dependent elements. Unlike existing methods, which deal with nonlinear and switching elements in the time domain, the approach presented is entirely in the harmonic domain. The method will be used for the harmonic analysis of power systems and for steady-state initialization in electromagnetic transient analysis. The algorithm takes rigorously into account the inter-harmonic couplings in the Jacobian matrix of the proposed Newton-Raphson iteration process so that a quadratic convergence rate is achieved. Linear, nonlinear, switching, and frequency dependent elements are modeled in a modular approach, and any network topology can be handled by extending the modified nodal equations approach to the harmonic domain case. First the algorithm is described and then applied to a test case to demonstrate its computational performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.Same topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207