MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2123753062 · doi:10.1109/igarss.1993.322590

The significance of the snow cover on sea ice to microwave scattering at 5.3 GHz

2002· article· en· W2123753062 on OpenAlexaff
David G. Barber, E. LeDrew, Tim Papakyriakou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowSynthetic aperture radarRemote sensingCryosphereSea iceSea ice thicknessMicrowaveSatelliteScatteringSnow coverRadarEnvironmental scienceGeologyMeteorologyGeophysicsClimatologyPhysicsGeomorphologyAerospace engineeringOpticsAstronomyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To successfully invert components of the marine cryosphere energy balance using active microwave remote sensing will require knowledge of the structural interrelationships between snow cover geophysics and the interaction of microwave energy. In this paper the authors present results of the geophysical (snow density, depth, grain morphology, and salinity) and electrical (dielectric permittivity and loss) properties of a snow cover on sea ice over the seasonal transition from winter to advanced melt. These data are used to drive a coupled volume and surface scattering model for a snow covered first-year sea ice surface. The model results and implications of sensitivity trials using these models, are compared with observations of the scattering surface using the European Earth Resourses Satellite-1 (ERS-1) synthetic aperture radar (SAR).>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→