Extending Beacon-Enabled IEEE 802.15.4 to Achieve Efficient Energy Savings: Simulation-Based Performance Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) operate in hostile environments under resource-constrained conditions. Power conservation is a primary factor that drives the design of these networks. Therefore, WSNs should not utilize complex algorithms that are power-hungry. The IEEE 802.15.4 standard is the appropriate suite of specifications that conforms to the distinguished characteristics of WSNs. This standard is suited for low data rate, low power, and low radio transmission ranges that are typical in WSNs. In this paper, we propose an extension to 802.15.4 that not only achieves efficient power savings, but also improves the reliability and the channel utilization in WSNs. In essence, we force each node that has just finished a successful packet transmission to sleep for a tunable period of time before contending for sending the next packet. We show through simulations that this behavior not only prolongs the lifetime of the WSN, but also achieves, compared to the original 802.15.4 standard, higher levels of channel utilization, better reliability, while preserving fairness among the nodes in the network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".