MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123791631 · doi:10.1080/10916460802105526

Variation of Rock and Fluid Temperature During Thermal Operation in Porous Media

2009· article· en· W2123791631 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Enamul Hossain, S. H. Mousavizadegan, M. R. Islam

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Science and Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
KeywordsPorous mediumThermalPorosityMatrix (chemical analysis)Fluid dynamicsMechanicsPetroleum engineeringGeologyEquation of stateThermodynamicsEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temperature distribution in a reservoir formation is an important indicator of various reservoir conditions, such as the state of water or gas influx, type of fluid encroachment, etc. This information is necessary for better reservoir management. This study investigates the temperature propagation pattern and its dependence on various parameters during thermal recovery operations. The model equation has been solved for temperature distribution throughout the reservoir for different cases. It was found that the fluid and rock matrix temperature difference is negligible. Results show that formation fluid velocity and time have an impact on the temperature profile behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetroleum Science and TechnologySame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207