The role of angiotensin II in the central regulation of feed intake in sheep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective was to determine the role of Angiotensin II (ANG) in the central regulation of feed intake by ruminants. As a control treatment, artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was given (over a period of 98.5 h) as a continuous intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion (0.2 mL h –1 ) into the lateral ventricle of ewes (n = 5). Approximately 9 d later, the infusion was repeated with the same ewes, but the CSF contained ANG (25 g μL –1 ). The ewes were fed dried alfalfa chaff for 2 h once daily and both water and a 0.5 M NaCl solution were available ad libitum (except that water intake was restricted on the first day of ANG infusion). Infusion of ANG resulted in severe thirst that persisted when water intake was restricted to an amount equal to voluntary intake during the control infusion. Furthermore, when ewes had ad libitum access to water, consumption during ANG infusion was 1.4 to 2.8-fold greater than that during CSF infusion (P < 0.01). Compared with CSF infusion, ANG infusion decreased eating rates by an average of 46.5% (range, 31.8–62.6%; P < 0.01) and feed intake by 25.0% (5.4–48.1%; P < 0.01), and increased salt intake by 273.8% (124.0–417.6%; P < 0.01). We concluded that ANG produced thirst sensations in the brain, resulting in excessive water intake that caused ruminal distension and significantly reduced feed intake. Key words: Angiotensin, brain, thirst, feed intake, sheep
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".