MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123842138 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-4968

Abstract 4968: Msi2 directly linked to Hedgehog and Wnt signaling in non-triple negative breast cancer

2014· article· en· W2123842138 on OpenAlexaff
Moustafa Abdalla, Nisha Kanwar, Yanglong Zhu, Ranju Nair, Bruce Youngson, Naomi Miller, Tianyu Liu, Susan J. Done

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWnt signaling pathwayTriple-negative breast cancerBiologyGLI1Cancer researchTissue microarrayHedgehogCancer stem cellCarcinogenesisStem cellNotch signaling pathwayCancerBreast cancerSignal transductionCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Previously, we have shown that a gain on 17q22.24.2 was a predictor of invasiveness when found in duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and of nodal metastasis when found in invasive duct carcinoma (IDC). Within this amplicon, we have identified a gene that is a likely driver of breast tumorigenesis and progression: Musashi homolog 2 (Msi2). Msi2 has a functional role in neural stem cell maintenance and regulation of hematopoietic stem cells. Previously, Msi2 has been implicated in Notch and Hedgehog signaling in leukemia, and here we link Msi2 to an increase in Wnt activation. Methodology: To understand the expression of Msi2 in patient tissue, tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 232 breast cancers were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells expressing Msi2-GFP and GFP clones were plated on transwells to examine cell migration and invasiveness. Proliferation was analyzed by the MTS assay. TOP-FOP and Gli1 Luciferase assays were used to confirm activation of Hedgehog and Wnt signaling. Western blots were used to assess total beta-catenin levels in the cell lines. Analysis of publicly available expression microarray databases and RT-PCR of the over-expression cell lines validated the proposed mechanism of action. Results: Tissue microarrays confirmed that Allred scores for Msi2 significantly correlated with grade, size stage, and non-triple negative receptor status. Over-expression of Msi2, in MDA-MB-231 (triple negative) and MCF7 (luminal cell type with epithelial morphology) cell lines, caused an increase in proliferation, migration and invasion. The knockdowns demonstrated the reverse effect. As determined by the TOP-FOP luciferase assay and RT-PCR, Msi2 leads to increased signaling of Hedgehog and Wnt. Furthermore, Msi2-mediated activation of Wnt occurs independently of total beta-catenin levels. Microarray analysis of breast cancer cell lines and patients' tumors supports this mechanism of action for Msi2 in non-triple negative cell lines (as assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient of pathway interactions). Conclusion: When overexpressed in a cancerous cell system in vitro, Msi2 levels correlate with increased migratory and invasive capabilities. Furthermore, its implication in Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt Signaling, make Msi2 a likely driver of the 17q22-24.2 amplicon in breast cancer. This study furthers our understanding of Msi2, and hints at the possibility that Msi2 plays a more significant role in cellular events and tumorigenesis than previously thought. Citation Format: Moustafa Abdalla, Nisha Kanwar, Yanglong Zhu, Ranju Nair, Bruce J. Youngson, Naomi A. Miller, Tianyu Liu, Susan J. Done. Msi2 directly linked to Hedgehog and Wnt signaling in non-triple negative breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4968. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4968

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesFrench-language works237,207