MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123863215 · doi:10.4021/jnr.v3i5.237

Usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the Assessment of Brain Chagas Disease: A Case Report

2013· article· en· W2123863215 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ángela Bernabéu, Eduardo Alcaraz‐Mateos, Susana López‐Celada

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrypanosoma species research and implications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChagas diseaseTrypanosoma cruziMedicinePathologyEncephalitisTrypanosomiasisDiseaseCentral nervous systemImmunologyVirusInternal medicineParasite hosting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chagas disease, or American trypanosomiasis, is a parasitic infection caused by the flagellate protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, an organism that is endemic to Latin America. While Chagas disease is primarily a vector-borne illness, new cases are emerging in non-endemic areas due to globalization of immigration and non-vectorial transmission routes. Once the infection has started, the main target organs are the heart, the alimentary tract, and the nervous system. However in immunosupressed patients, focal encephalitis due to T. cruzi infection may occur which tends to acquire a necrotizing feature with mass effect, perilesional edema, and pseudotumoral form (CTLAT, “cerebral tumor-like American trypanosomiasis”). In recent years, a few reports have described HIV-positive patients with central nervous system lesions due to Chagas disease. Here we report the clinical, neuroimaging, and histopathological findings of a patient with CTLAT and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. To our knowledge, this is the first report in literature of the metabolite pattern assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in these lesions. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jnr237w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicTrypanosoma species research and implicationsFrench-language works237,207