A Clustering-Based Method for Quantifying the Effects of Large On-Grid PV Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analyzing the impacts of large on-grid photovoltaic (PV) systems on the performance of the electric network is an essential task prior to the installation of these systems. To quantify these impacts, a method based on chronological simulations can be used. The main advantage of this method is its ability to provide information about the impacts of the fluctuation of the power generated from the PV systems. However, this method requires performing extensive analysis and simulations, making it impractical for utility studies, especially if long historical data with subhourly time resolution is used. In this paper, a new method that utilizes the data efficiently while preserving the temporal information of the generated PV power is proposed. The method takes advantage of the clustering techniques to group together segments of the output PV power having similar features. Hence, a representative segment for each group can be chosen and used in the analysis and simulations. This representative segment can provide information about the expected performance of other segments of the group. The validity and usefulness of the proposed method are demonstrated by identifying the suitable size and site of a large PV system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it