MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123903946 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.2000.885219

Degradation of Teflon/sup TM/ by electrical discharge in high-humidity air

2002· article· en· W2123903946 on OpenAlexaff
Joran Velikonja, Joshua A. Robinson, M.A. Bergougnou, G.S.P. Castle, W.L. Cairns, I.I. Inculet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMembraneComposite materialElectrodeDielectricDielectric barrier dischargeHigh voltageDielectric strengthOzoneScanning electron microscopeHumidityDielectric withstand testElectrical breakdownPartial dischargeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)VoltageElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsChemistryChromatographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A long-term durability test of high-voltage AC electrodes for ozone generation in a novel type of advanced oxidation reactor has been conducted. In this reactor, ozone is produced by dielectric-barrier discharge through humid gas in a parallel-plate geometry, with water as the ground electrode. Teflon membranes were chosen as dielectric barriers for reasons of the highly aggressive nature of the plasma. The flat, metallic parts of the electrodes, parallel with the water surface, were embedded in a second dielectric, contiguous with the Teflon membranes. The test was carried out continuously for 20 weeks, with room-temperature air as the atmosphere, over stagnant deionized water, at 24 kV and 30 kV (rms), 60 Hz. A set of 32 small electrodes was used for each voltage. The lower of the two voltages was at the threshold of corona discharge (and ozone generation). Three different membrane thicknesses (0.01 in, 0.02 in, 0.03 in) were tested. The second dielectric was silicone transformer oil. Six 0.02-in and six 0.03-in membranes at 30 kV failed due to dielectric breakdown, as well as one 0.01-in membrane at 24 kV. A failure was always accompanied by a perforation of the membrane and a shutdown of the power supply. The frequency of the occurrence of failures increased with time. Scanning electron microscopy was done on some of the membrane perforations. In addition to the failures, a progressive deterioration of the membrane surfaces was observed. In a number of membranes this resulted in open cracks through which the silicone oil slowly leaked and polymerized on the outer membrane surfaces. Particularly susceptible were 0.01-in membranes, some of which had to be exchanged before the completion of the test. Interestingly, no actual dielectric breakdown occurred in these cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207