MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2123905928 · doi:10.25011/cim.v30i4.2839

Global gene expression analyses in early experimental osteoarthritis reveal novel players in articular cartilage degenerations

2007· article· en· W2123905928 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S.E. Usmani, Vasek Pitelka, J Mankin Henry, Suzanne M. Bernier, Frank Beier

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChondrocyteCartilageOsteoarthritisMicroarray analysis techniquesCell biologyGene expressionTransforming growth factorBiologyPathologyMedicineGeneAnatomyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Articular cartilage degeneration is a hallmark of osteoarthritis (OA). We sought to identify dysregulated genes in degenerating cartilage and hypothesized that altered growth factor expression causes cartilage degradation in OA. Methods: Genome-wide microarray analysis of RNA harvested directly from sham (control) and degenerating articular cartilage was performed using our previously characterized pre-clinical rat model of knee OA1. Known OA genes were validated using RNA samples (real-time PCR) and histological sections (immunofluorescence) from independent animals. Functional studies in chondrocytes and articular cartilage explants investigated the effects of one identified factor (transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α)) on cartilage degeneration. The effects of TGF-α on primary chondrocyte morphology, proliferation, gene expression, and SOX9 transcription factor expression were assessed. Results: Dysregulated gene expression profiles in degenerating cartilage included known OA genes2. Microarray expression profiles were consistently validated at RNA and protein levels by alternative methods. Several genes previously unstudied in OA cartilage were upregulated, including growth factors (e.g. TGF-α and kit ligand), cell surface receptors (e.g. endothelin type A receptor), and proteases (e.g. cathepsin S). Functional studies demonstrated that TGF-α alters chondrocyte morphology through re-organization of the actin cytoskeleton. TGF-α also stimulated primary chondrocyte proliferation and chondrocyte cluster formation in cartilage explants. Chondrocyte expression of anabolic genes and total collagen protein levels were reduced by TGF-α, while expression of catabolic factors increased. Finally, TGF-α reduced both the expression of total SOX9 and levels of phosphorylated (active) SOX9. Conclusions: Our microarray study identified numerous factors previously unstudied in OA cartilage, including increased levels of TGF-α. Functional studies determined that TGF-α promotes cartilage degeneration through chondrocyte proliferation and catabolic factor expression. Further, TGF-α inhibits chondrocyte anabolism, likely through a mechanism involving suppression of SOX9. References: 1C.T.G. Appleton et al. (2007). Arthritis Res Ther 9(1):R13. 2C.T.G. Appleton et al. (2007), Arthritis Rheum In Press.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicine→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→